Taking in new cases now · 9am–5:30pm, weekdays In a rush? Ring 0800 6890668
BHDR Birmingham Data Recovery 0800 6890668 Get it seen
BHDR / Court evidence and enquiries / Expert witness reports

Reports for court · digital forensics, Birmingham

Expert witness reports, Birmingham. Everything the court needs — including what weakens us.

CPR Part 35 puts the expert to work for the court first — ahead of client, solicitor and whoever is paying. Birmingham holds one of the biggest concentrations of law firms outside London, and the people instructing us know what happens to a report written to win an argument: it snaps the first time a competent opponent leans on it. That rule is where our reports begin.

CPR 35 and CrimPR 19 compliant reports Custody recorded in full Independent and discreet

Call us, in confidence
0800 6890668

What every court report has to carry.

Who the expert works forThe expert's role under Part 35 is to assist the court, and only on ground they can genuinely speak to; that role outranks whatever the instructing side would prefer to hear. It sits at the front of the report and every page after it is judged against it.
The two declarationsThe report marks off which facts are within the expert's own knowledge and true, states that the opinions are honestly held with nothing left out, and confirms that it meets Part 35 together with the practice direction under it.
Method, and the exhibit trailArrival, imaging, hash values, examination and where the exhibit sat at every point, cross-referenced closely enough for an opposing examiner to run the whole thing again.
What can be used against usSince 2019 the criminal rules have made an expert declare whatever bears on their credibility, and a missing accreditation is named in terms. Ours appears in the first pages, not buried in a closing footnote.

Which report fits which case.

Not listed? Call the lab →
Report typeWhere it fitsWhat it contains
Plain findings reportFirst advice, HR matters, decisions at board levelWhat we found, the route taken to it, and what it means, said plainly
Insurance and loss-claim reportWhen cause, scale and liability are in disputeFindings, exhibits and a section on causation
A CPR Part 35 reportCivil claims in England and WalesThe overriding duty set out, your instruction on the record, the full method, and both declarations signed — truth and compliance
A CrimPR Part 19 reportCases before the criminal courtsThe same again in criminal form: qualifications, the material that goes to reliability, credibility declared
One expert, both partiesWhere one expert has been appointed to serve both partiesOne report, identical for each side, with the duty running past them both to the court
Sending it by post: send it insured and tracked to the intake lab, and we cover the carriage home; if you would sooner talk the packing through before it travels, ring us first. Full instructions are on the posting page.

What happens, in order.

Every case on file →
01

We scope it in confidence, then price it in writing Free

Nothing begins until we have talked it through privately. Tell us what happened, which devices and accounts it reaches, and what the evidence has to prove; those three answers fix the scope, and the scope fixes the one written price you receive before anyone examines a device. That conversation is free.

Held in confidenceOne price, put in writingWhat the case has to prove
02

Said before we start

The letter of instruction goes into the report, summarised in our own words. Anything touching our credibility goes in beside it — first among them an independent lab holding no accreditation — set down before the examination begins instead of being dragged out of us in the witness box.

Instruction on the recordCredibility stated up front
03

Built for a hostile read

Work is performed, and logged, with an opposing examiner in mind: the one who will read it looking for the weak joint, because sooner or later somebody does. Conclusions never tilt towards the party paying for them.

Duty runs to the courtConclusions that do not bend
04

In the court's own format

Which court you are in decides the shape: CPR Part 35 for civil, CrimPR Part 19 for criminal. Either way you get the method written out, the exhibits, an unbroken continuity record and both declarations. Conclusions come first and the technical annex sits at the back.

Formatted to CPR 35 or CrimPR 19Plain English throughout
05

Hashed, logged and handed over

Everything goes across: the report, the exhibits, the source files, hash values, the continuity log and the notes written at the bench. An opposing expert, or the tribunal itself, can repeat every step and end up with the same answer.

Findings and exhibitsEvery movement logged, hashes on fileRepeatable by others

How we work at the bench

  • The overriding duty decides everything else — when what suits the court and what suits the client pull apart, the court wins, and a report written without grasping that is dead on arrival.
  • Criminal work demands reliability material — the bench needs qualifications and experience set out on the page before it can decide what an opinion is worth.
  • A joint instruction changes the sums — two lots of instructions, a single examiner, nobody to favour. We take that work and say so up front.
  • Clear writing is part of the duty — if a judge has to fight the prose, the report has failed, however good the work sitting beneath it.

One question to put to any expert you are considering: the criminal practice directions have, from April 2019, expected anything liable to weaken confidence in an expert's reliability to be brought into the open, with an accreditation not held named among them. Left unsaid, it stops being the expert's difficulty and becomes yours. Ours is on the first page of every report that leaves here.

Recent pages of the casebook.

BH · BHD-2026-8534RECORDED ✓

One shared folder, two Worcestershire firms, a Part 35 report

One folder sat between two companies and two sets of accounts that refused to agree. The image showed that neither copy had been left alone, and the timeline put that beyond argument. The matter settled inside a month.

Closed post-exchangeCPR 35 compliant

Before the parcel goes.

Do this first

  • Say at the outset if this could end up in court; the method changes
  • Send the instruction letter as soon as you can
  • Forward whatever the opposing expert sends over
  • Budget weeks rather than days; this work will not be rushed

What not to do

  • Push for a finding the evidence cannot carry
  • Rewrite our sentences; take the reasoning apart instead
  • Expect a Part 35 report inside a week
  • Go looking for an expert who already agrees; judges spot it

The questions people ring about.

What separates a court report from an ordinary findings report?

A findings report tells you what we found and how we got there. Court work stacks more on top: the overriding duty set down, your instruction summarised, the method and the exhibit history in full, the truth and compliance declarations both signed, and anything that could be used to undermine the expert put in writing.

Whose side is the expert on?

Nobody's, whoever pays. Helping the court is the first obligation and it outranks everything owed to the party who instructed us — and that order of priority is exactly why the report is worth having.

Do you take single joint expert instructions?

Yes. One report gets written, both sides receive the same wording at the same hour, and neither party gets an early look at it or a chance to comment first.

Does holding no accreditation weaken the report?

The rules say declare it, so it goes in the opening pages rather than a footnote. A court weighs the method, because that is where authority actually comes from. Reports fall over for claiming too much, not for a missing certificate.

The loop does not stop and wait for you.

Every hour the recorder runs, more of what you need is gone, and the deadline stays where it is. Book it in now: the diagnosis is free and stays confidential.

0800 6890668